Standard input makes it convenient for us to write programs that process arbitrary amounts of input and to interact with our programs; standard draw makes it possible for us to work with graphics; and standard audio adds sound.
Some articles a particularly prone to addition of incorrect claims, because many people believe those claims are correct, and because many references can be cited for them. I think a serious encyclopedia should mention such claims, and debunk them.
If they are just ignored, they will be added again and again, and many readers yes, we do have readers too may not get any wiser from reading our articles. So not mentioning the Nautilius in the main article is imho not the best choice. Jacquerie27 I do not like this edit at all.
First, it moved the nice, friendly introduction into multiple sections, which are unnecessary. The history and other names sections are pretty pointless. Second, that edit starts off the article with some math, which I don't think is a good idea.
Next, the nice, flowing derivation of the math equations is interrupted, and part of it is just diverted to a "Mathematical Properties" section.
Corinna Rossi PhD was a Junior Research Fellow extended post doc because she couldn't get a proper job in Egyptology at Churchill College, Cambridgeat the time that the text was originally published last year. Over references are cited. This is not dubious scholarship by any measure.
Sorry, it seems our edits crossed. Anyway, the section right below makes clear my reasons. I suggest you've done a severe misreading of her text. At the least, your summary is misleading. Continue this in the section below please, so that it's clear to everyone what your response to my reasons are.
As a side note, your idea of what makes non-dubious scholarship is pretty amusing. The number of references is not important there. Rossi's work may or may not be dubious, but the number of references has little to do with that. Neither does the fact that Cambridge University Press published it.
Churchill College is a "Scientific and Technological based college" inside of the University of Cambridge. Still you don't get it. The number of references means nothing. There are books about all kinds of garbage that have hundreds of references.
What does that mean?Apache redirect from one domain to another domain. You don't need to rewrite this.. just add another vhost that points to the same DocumentRoot, e.g.: redirect from one site to another.
0. Redirect all subdomains, subpages, and the root domain to themselves on another domain. 1. Khan Academy is a nonprofit with the mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. If you're seeing this message, it means we're having trouble loading external resources on .
redirecting an entire WP site from one top level domain to another. up vote 0 down vote favorite.
I think I know the best way to proceed doing this but just want to get some reassuring thumbs up before going ahead. Redirect one domain to another. 3. Redirecting old permalink to new one. 0. Mod rewrite redirection to another domain if file not exist.
Ask Question. up vote 2 down vote favorite. rewrite main domain to a sub-directory urbanagricultureinitiative.comss. 1 Redirect subdomain of one domain to a subdomain of another domain.
0. mod rewrite rewriting but not redirecting. 0. Mod rewrite: redirect on trailing slash. Sep 25, · A logarithmic expression is an expression having logarithms in it.
To condense logarithmic expressions means to use the logarithm laws to reduce logarithm expressions from the expanded form to a.
1. To solve a logarithmic equation, rewrite the equation in exponential form and solve for the variable. Step 2: By now you should know that when the base of the exponent and the base of the logarithm are the same, the left side can be written x.
The equation can now be written. You can also check.